The Lego issues are fascinating and highlights a real challenge of how sometimes looking to use more sustainable products, is actually at a higher cost in other ways.
The Turing Test, as originally formulated, is widely recognised as flawed and largely irrelevant these days largely because our understanding of what it means to be intelligent has developed so much over the decades. It's even been described as a test "not for AI to pass, but for humans to fail". I came across this fascinating article recently: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adq9356
The Lego issues are fascinating and highlights a real challenge of how sometimes looking to use more sustainable products, is actually at a higher cost in other ways.
Too true. I sometime tell my clients, "The real strategists are the ones who ask, "When you're successful at X, what new problems will that create?"
I like this!
The Turing Test, as originally formulated, is widely recognised as flawed and largely irrelevant these days largely because our understanding of what it means to be intelligent has developed so much over the decades. It's even been described as a test "not for AI to pass, but for humans to fail". I came across this fascinating article recently: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adq9356